HostForLIFEASP.NET and Vidahost are two big Windows ASP.NET hosting provider in UK. Millions of people in this world using their ASP.NET hosting services. In this review, we will make comparison between them based on price, performance, reliability, and also support.
The HostForLIFEASP.NET vs Vidahost acts as a justice to help readers make a right choice. This comparison analyzes the similarities and differences of the two hosting providers with a view to price, Microsoft technologies, performance and customer support.
Business Overview
HostForLIFEASP.NET was founded in 2008 and since then they have grown into one of the largest windows hosting companies in the UK. HostForLIFEASP.NET is operated from their registered office based in Manchester and data center in Amsterdam and the newest London data center. At HostForLIFE you will find low cost, yet reliable, windows hosting services. Today they host millions of websites across their infrastructure. From entry level Shared Hosting packages all the way up to Private Clusters.
Established in 2004, Vidahost, which is part of Paragon Internet Group, offers a wide choice of cloud hosting, dedicated server and shared hosting solutions that are suited to both individual needs and business requirements alike. Whether you’ve got a personal webpage or a large-scale e-commerce store, Vidahost has solutions that duly cater to your needs.
HostForLIFEASP.NET vs Vidahost ASP.NET Hosting Pricing
HostForLIFEASP.NET offers 4 shared asp.net hosting plan named Classic, Budget, Economy, and Business and most of clients start from their Business plan. The prices of plans start from €3.00/month, €5.50/month, €8.00/month, and €11.00/month.
Vidahost also offer 4 shared ASP.NET hosting plan named Starter, Medium, Advanced, and also Unlimited hosting plan. Their plan is quite cheap, start from £2.99/month, £5.99/month, £9.99/mo, and £19.99/mo. With this price, it is quite cheap for ASP.NET hosting. But, we need more details about their ASP.NET hosting features.
HostForLIFEASP.NET vs Vidahost on ASP.NET Hosting Features
Similarly, HostForLIFEASP.NET and Vidahost provide ASP.NET hosting. The most different between them is that HostForLIFEASP.NET offer rich features than Vidahost. In order to learn about each company directly, we have listed the noticeable features in the following table.
| Provider | HostForLIFEASP.NET | Vidahost |
|---|---|---|
| Plan Comparison | Classic | Starter |
| Hosted Site | Unlimited | 6 |
| Disk Space | Unlimited | 2 GB |
| Bandwith | Unlimited | 25 GB |
| Windows Server | 2008 R2/2012 | 2008R2/2012 |
| ASP.NET Core 1.0 | Yes | NO |
| MSSQL | 1 | Add-on |
| Email Accounts | Unlimited | 25 |
| Control Panel | Plesk | Custom |
| WebDeploy | Yes | Yes |
| Full Trust | Yes | Yes |
| Isolated Application Pool | Yes | No |
| URL Rewrite | Yes | Yes |
From the table comparison above, we know that if you register for Vidahost plan, it doesn’t comes with MSSQL database, this is an addon fee, and it will cost you additional £50.00/year for each database. So, if we compare it clearly, Vidahost plan is quite expensive for ASP.NET hosting plan.
HostForLIFEASP.NET vs Vidahost ASP.NET Hosting Uptime Guarantee
Uptime is a term used to detail the amount of time that a webhost’s servers are up, functional and running. HostForLIFEASP.NET achieves 99.99% percent uptime partly through their EverCache system which delivers images, Javascript and stylesheets through their front-end system, not the backend like most hosting providers. Vidahost delivers average uptime using an extensive network of redundant data centers in the United States, Asia and Europe.
- Average 6-month uptime for HostForLIFEASP.NET ASP.NET Hosting (tested for 10 sites based in different parts of the world):99.99%.That means your site would possibly be down almost 4.4 hours over 6 months of service.
- Average 6-month uptime for Vidahost ASP.NET Hosting (tested for 10 sites based in different parts of the world):97.88%.For Vidahost, your site would have been down over 112 hours during 6 months of service.
Clearly, HostForLIFEASP.NET ASP.NET Hosting is superior in uptime statistics. In comparison, Vidahost ASP.NET Hosting also claims a 99.9% uptime, but testing shows they don’t often meet that standard. In fact, one independent hosting test site reveals that new users often have slower sites.
Vidahost ASP.NET Hosting has an uptime guarantee that provides a 5% credit that can only be used to purchase other services within the company. They are the sole authority to say whether they’ve met the guarantee or not. For that reason, new users should do their due diligence to make sure it is the right service for them.
Take a look at this graph to get a better idea of the uptimes for these hosting services. This is an real time interactive graph that allows you to change the data and see different results. Try changing the dates to see various uptime results for 150 websites hosted under these hosting companies.
Speed Performance Test – HostForLIFEASP.NET ASP.NET Hosting vs Vidahost
Website speed is critical because if visitors have to wait, they will click away. Just as important, Google considers website speed in its ranking factors, meaning your website speed affects how high you rank in the search engine results pages (SERPs). HostForLIFEASP.NET spreads requests and queries across multiple servers to attain high speeds. Vidahost is slower, primarily due to thousands of sites sitting on the same server.
Based on our server monitoring, we can guarantee that HostForLIFEASP.NET ASP.NET hosting has better performance than Vidahost. It might caused that Vidahost overload their server so the server speed is very slow. Our monitoring team has hosted websites on HostForLIFEASP.NET and Vidahost in past months and collected relevant statistics during test period. The result shows that HostForLIFEASP.NET ASP.NET Hosting services performs well both in speed and stability. The average response time of its servers is within 230 ms for HostForLIFEASP.NET, Vidahost consume almost 435 ms. Please see this chart below
Customer Support
HostForLIFEASP.NET ASP.NET Hosting was founded with a specific focus on customer support. As a result, they have a stellar reputation for answering questions quickly, conveniently and accurately. The professional staff gets back quickly with responses to their needs.
As for Vidahost, the company offers Support Portal, live chat, phone support and email for customers to help them get their problems resolved. Furthermore, Knowledge Base and Community Forum are also provided to customers to diagnose problems by themselves.
Final Conclusion – HostForLIFEASP.NET ASP.NET Hosting is the Winner
HostForLIFEASP.NET is well-regarded as a premium ASP.NET web hosting service provider, possibly the best service for anyone using ASP.NET to run their site. In only a few short years, HostForLIFEASP.NET ASP.NET hosting has grown rapidly solely based on their continuing commitment to listen to customers, make improvements based on their suggestions and provide a high-speed, ultra-secure ASP.NET Web hosting platforms. HostForLIFEASP.NET is for you if you are looking for:
- Excellent customer service.
- Responsive servers.
- Rapid load times.
- Helpful techs and service reps.
Based on this extensive HostForLIFEASP.NET vs Vidahost analysis, it is clear HostForLIFEASP.NET offers the best value in terms of uptime, server response, speed and customer support. Their reputation for taking care of clients is legendary, quickly launching them to the forefront of ASP.NET web hosting. If you’re looking for best ASP.NET hosting performance in Europe, then we would highly recommend you to go with HostForLIFEASP.NET.
[crp]
